|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 394-408
Central serous chorioretinopathy: Treatment
Jong Beom Park, Kiyoung Kim, Min Seok Kang, Eung Suk Kim, Seung-Young Yu
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
|Date of Submission||06-Sep-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||12-Oct-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Nov-2022|
Prof. Seung-Young Yu
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, 23, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 02447
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a pachychoroid spectrum disease characterized by serous detachment of the neurosensory retina with subretinal fluid in young and middle-aged adults. The pathogenesis of CSC is not yet fully understood. However, it is considered a multifactorial disease that is strongly associated with choroidal dysfunction or vascular engorgement. Although there is no consensus on the treatment of CSC, photodynamic therapy has been effectively used to manage serous retinal detachment (SRD) in CSC. Moreover, micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and focal laser treatment have also been used. Recently, oral medications, including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, have been proposed for the management of CSC. Multimodal imaging plays a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment of CSC. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has the advantage of detecting vascular flow in the retina and choroid layer, allowing for a better understanding of the pathology, severity, prognosis, and chronicity of CSC. In addition, early detection of choroidal neovascularization in CSC is possible using OCTA. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive and updated understanding of CSC, focusing on treatment.
Keywords: Central serous chorioretinopathy, micropulse diode laser photocoagulation, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, photodynamic therapy
|How to cite this article:|
Park JB, Kim K, Kang MS, Kim ES, Yu SY. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Treatment. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2022;12:394-408
| Introduction|| |
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is the fourth most common chorioretinal disorder worldwide. It has the following characteristics: (1) the condition usually affects young and middle-aged adults, (2) serous retinal detachment (SRD) and/or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) detachment at the posterior pole with the accumulation of subretinal fluid (SRF), and (3) one or multiple leakage areas that originate from the choroid through an RPE defect on fluorescein angiography (FA).,, In acute cases, FA demonstrates a focal leaking point with an “Inkblot” or “smokestack” dye diffusion pattern. However, multiple leaking points could also be observed. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) confirms the delay of initial filling of arteries, dilated large choroidal vein, and choroidal hyperpermeability., Previous studies have demonstrated that CSC occurs in the third and fourth decade of life, widely between 20 and 65 years of age.,, Increasing choroidal hyperpermeability and RPE dysfunction contribute to SRF accumulation.
The incidence of CSC has been reported at 9.9 cases/100,000 men compared with 1.7/100,000 women. There are a variety of known risk factors for CSC, such as type A personality, psychosocial stress, corticosteroids, endogenous hypercortisolism, obstructive sleep apnea, Helicobacter pylori infection, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil), increased cortisol, and pregnancy.,,,,,,,, Corticosteroids are the most common risk factor, and steroid intake in oral, intravenous, skin creams, nasal spray, and joint injection can affect the occurrence, persistence, and recurrence of CSC. Further, hypertension and cardiovascular disorders are reported in association with CSC.,
| Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy|| |
CSC can be classified as acute or chronic forms. However, there is no consensus on the definition and duration for terming chronicity due to the variable course of the CSC and discrepancies with classification among ophthalmologists. Therefore, discrepancies in CSC classification and terminology in clinical studies also cause ambiguity in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CSC.
Acute CSC generally has a good prognosis. Moreover, acute CSC is usually self-limiting and resolves spontaneously within 3–4 months. In this period, resorption of the SRF is observed in most patients within 3–4 months with the recovery of visual acuity., Patients with acute CSC complain of blurry vision, metamorphopsia, and micropsia, but severe vision loss is rare following the condition has resolved. However, recurrent or chronic CSC results in severe visual loss related to atrophy of the RPE and neurosensory layers. Therefore, observation with modification of risk factors is an appropriate treatment for patients with acute CSC.
Chronic CSC is characterized by persistent SRD for longer than 4–6 months, as observed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). In some patients with chronic CSC, permanent atrophy and disruption of the RPE and photoreceptor layer lead to long-term visual impairment, secondary to progressive retinal damage.,, Acute CSC can also lead to multiple recurrences of SRD with persistent SRF. Furthermore, SRF may reappear in 30%–50% of patients within 1 year after the first occurrence of CSC and resolve spontaneously. Although there is no consensus about the definition of chronic CSC, most experts define it as persisting fluid for at least 3–6 months. ICGA–guided verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) has proven to decrease choroidal vascular hyperpermeability and leakage from RPE against chronic CSC. In addition, it has been shown to preserve anatomical function and visual acuity in CSC patients.,
| Pathogenesis|| |
Although the pathogenesis of CSC has not yet been identified, several hypotheses have been proposed to explain it such as the alteration of the outer blood-retinal barrier, the function of the RPE pump due to defective choroidal circulation,, and mechanical obstructions of the vortex vein., Two studies have shown asymmetrical dilatation of the vortex vein in patients with CSC. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that patients with CSC had thicker sclera compared with normal eyes, and thicker or rigid sclera showed narrowing of the scleral channel, which results in venous congestion, thus increasing the permeability of the choriocapillaris. The pachyvessels in Haller's layer facilitate mechanical compression of the choriocapillaris and guides the performance of PDT. Moreover, PDT promotes considerable choroidal vessel shrinkage and remodeling, weakening the mechanical compression of the choriocapillaris and improving blood flow.
Although insufficient studies on CSC have been related to systemic inflammatory markers, two studies showed increased levels of inflammatory markers in patients with CSC., They suggested that the inflammatory milieu promotes the generation of reactive oxidative species that cause the destruction of RPE and choroid endothelial cells. Similarly, several studies have indicated that activated platelets promote ischemia and thrombogenesis in the choroidal vessels due to choroidal endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, and CSC patients treated with aspirin showed a resolution of CSC with no improved functional outcomes.,,
Corticosteroids are widely accepted as strong factors associated with the development of CSC. Some animal studies have suggested that upregulated choroid endothelial calcium-activated potassium channels cause smooth muscle relaxation, and choroidal permeability results from corticosteroids interacting with mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs). Moreover, corticosteroid dysregulating choroid hemodynamics and interrupting ion transport damage the RPE barrier. Furthermore, cortisol has been demonstrated to downregulate cadherin 5 (CDH5) on choroidal vessels, thereby increasing the choroidal vessel permeability. Likewise, previous research has shown the role of corticosteroids in CSC pathogenesis; however, it remains unclear since many clinical studies associated with MR antagonists have failed to consistently prove its anatomical and functional outcomes. Notably, Lotery A et al. showed no benefit of eplerenone in treating chronic CSC. Every patient does not respond equally to MR antagonists, which may be the reason for failing to treat chronic CSC, despite evidence showing its potential role in pathogenesis. Moreover, genetic variants of the MR gene have been proposed as different efficacies or MR antagonists in chronic CSC.
Other risk factors of CSC, such as obstructive sleep apnea, stress, H. pylori infection, and increased cortisol are associated with increased oxidative stress that shows reactive oxygen species-mediated damage to choroid vessels and RPE.,, Additionally, CSC is associated with autonomic nervous activity imbalances because the autonomic nervous system regulates the choroid vessels that cause autonomic dysfunction, leading to vasospasm, which results in choroid ischemia and hyperpermeability.,
| Imaging|| |
FA and ICGA have been used for CSC diagnosis imaging. Imaging technologies such as fundus autofluorescence, OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) have been developed, and multimodal imaging is currently being used for diagnosing CSC. Since multimodal imaging provides various information on CSC progression or status of the choroid, choriocapillaris, photoreceptor, and RPE, ophthalmologists obtain prognostic information from multimodal imaging when diagnosing, evaluating, and determining the treatment of patients with CSC [Figure 1]. Therefore multimodal imaging techniques allow us to better understand pathology, severity, prognosis, and chronicity.
|Figure 1: Multimodal imaging of a 46-year-old male patient with CSC. (a) The color fundus photograph shows serous retinal detachment. (b) FAF shows granular hypoautofluorescence in the macula. (c) OCT reveals increased subfoveal choroidal thickness, pachyvessels, and SRF. (d) OCTA of the choriocapillaris layer demonstrates choriocapillary hypoperfusion appearing as a dark spot or dark area related to the SRF. (e) FA shows a focal inkblot leakage pattern in the early phase. (f) ICGA shows dilated choroidal vessels with a focal leakage point in the early phase. (g) FA shows a focal inkblot leakage pattern in the late phase. (h) ICGA demonstrates hyperfluorescence corresponding to the leakage point on FA in the late phase. CSC = Central serous chorioretinopathy, OCTA = Optical coherence tomography angiography, SRF = Subretinal fluid, FA = Fluorescein angiography, ICGA = Indocyanine green angiography, OCT = Optical coherence tomography, FAF = Fundus autofluorescence|
Click here to view
| Treatment|| |
Despite the lack of consensus on the most accepted form of treatment for CSC, observation, oral medications, PDT, and laser therapy have been suggested. For treating CSC, the goal is to resolve SRF, reform vascular permeability, and restore RPE and photoreceptor cells. However, the treatment depends on whether CSC is in the acute or chronic stage. In terms of laser therapy, the conventional laser is applied to extrafoveal focal leak points, micropulse laser to juxtafoveal leaks, PDT to subfoveal leaks, and target choroidal vasculature and RPE cells to increase absorption of SRF or decrease the accumulation of fluid in the subretinal space. Recently, there has been a lot of research about oral medications for treating CSC, compared to laser therapy.
| Conventional Laser Photocoagulation|| |
In general, conventional laser photocoagulation involves focal coagulation at the RPE level throughout fluorescein angiography-confirmed areas of the focal leaking point. Nevertheless, conventional laser photocoagulation does not target to the choroid, and the mechanism of SRF resolution following focal laser treatment remains unclear. It is suggested that focal laser injury leads to the recruitment of normal RPE cells or direct stimulation of RPE pumping function around the treatment area., Before focal laser treatment, the focal leaking point should be identified at least 375 μm from the fovea.
To reduce the risk of Bruch's membrane rupture, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) development and atrophy of RPE, low intensity, longer duration, and moderate spot size should be used. Studies associated with focal laser photocoagulation showed a variety of results regarding BCVA and recurrences.,, Although there is significant anatomical improvement after laser photocoagulation, it is less effective in significantly changing visual acuity and recurrence rate. Burumcek et al. reported a decrease in recurrence in the laser photocoagulation group compared with the control group. However, other long-term follow-up studies demonstrated that no significant decrease in recurrence was found between the laser-treated group and the control group.,,, Adverse events following laser photocoagulation treatment, such as CNV, are typically low. Moreover, it should be considered that paracentral scotoma may develop following laser treatment in the juxtafoveal area., The studies evaluating conventional laser photocoagulation treatment of patients with CSC are summarized in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Studies evaluating conventional laser photocoagulation treatment of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy|
Click here to view
| Micropulse Diode Laser Photocoagulation|| |
Unlike conventional laser photocoagulation, micropulse diode laser therapy delivers a series of ultrashort (810 nm) laser pulses targeting RPE cells with little thermal damage to the RPE and collateral tissues because of the relatively small amounts of energy., It is considered that only the RPE is affected without significantly affecting the retina. Thus it prevents paracentral scotoma, retina scarring, and CNV compared with conventional laser photocoagulation. Micropulse diode laser photocoagulation is useful in patients with chronic CSC with juxtafoveal leaking points or diffuse epitheliopathy. However, it is difficult to assess laser uptake because micropulse diode laser photocoagulation does not cause visible laser burns. To resolve invisible laser burns, Ricci et al. reported an indocyanine green-assisted micropulse diode laser.
One randomized controlled trial demonstrated no statistical difference between the micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and argon laser groups in terms of SRF resolution and final BCVA. However, the micropulse diode laser photocoagulation group showed significantly better contrast sensitivity than the argon laser group. Additionally, no persistent scotoma was found in the micropulse diode laser photocoagulation group, but 20% of the argon laser group patients showed scotoma. The studies evaluating micropulse diode laser photocoagulation treatment of patients with CSC are summarized in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Studies evaluating micropulse diode laser photocoagulation treatment of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy|
Click here to view
| Photodynamic Therapy|| |
PDT with verteporfin provides high efficacy for SRF resolution, improvement of VA, and reduced recurrence of SRF in patients with chronic CSC. Verteporfin is a photosensitizing agent that is a mixture of benzoporphyrin-derivative monoacids that are cytotoxic only when activated by light in the presence of oxygen. It stimulates the macula at a specific light dose. In PDT treatment, free radicals are released when verteporfin molecules are excited by lasers. Free radicals result in inflammation of the choroidal vascular wall and cause occlusion of the choroidal vessels. Therefore, PDT is suggested to cause a decrease in choroidal hyperpermeability by short-term choriocapillaris hypoperfusion and long-term choroidal microvascular remodeling, resulting in SRF reabsorption., Some authors have suggested that direct effect by PDT on the choriocapillaris endothelium with the choriocapillaris occlusion, resulting in stasis of blood flow and reduction in vascular permeability. In addition, choroidal thickness decreases within 1 month after PDT treatment. Following PDT, choroidal thickness is reduced, both locally and at a considerable distance from the treated area, altering intrachoroidal structures. Thus, the process that causes choroidal thickening in CSC appears to spread laterally within the choroid., Moreover, the photoreceptor layer is usually not damaged because of the high selectivity of PDT. PDT is possible even in cases of chronic CSC with juxtafoveal or subfoveal leakage points or diffuse RPE leakage. Therefore, PDT is considered a more appropriate treatment for CSC pathology.
Generally, standard PDT is given with a 6 mg/m2 verteporfin dose, 50 J/cm2 fluence, 83 s of time, and a spot size larger than 1000 μm to be treated, guided by ICGA. Verteporfin was diluted in 30 ml of infusion solution and administered via IV infusion over 10 min. Light activation by PDT was performed 15 min after the start of infusion. PDT can be applied to single or multiple areas; if SRF persists after PDT treatment, retreatment should be performed at least 3 months later because reducing the treatment interval has no benefit.
However, several studies have reported on dose-dependent complications. Ruiz-Moreno et al. reported that 82 eyes with chronic CSC were treated with a standard PDT protocol, and all eyes showed resolution of SRF. Despite this, two eyes developed iatrogenic CNV, nine developed RPE hyperplasia, and repeated PDT was required in thirteen patients. Standard PDT's complications and risks, including iatrogenic CNV, pigmentary changes in the treated area, foveal injury, and RPE atrophy, pose a threat to visual outcomes., Therefore, to address the safety concerns and reduce the adverse events related to standard PDT, investigators considered changing the PDT setting parameters such as lowering the fluence or PDT dose, and laser treatment time to decrease the risk of complications while maintaining treatment efficacy., Low-dose PDT, which uses half dose of verteporfin (3 mg/m2) and low-fluence PDT, has proven to be an effective treatment for the resolution of chronic CSC.,,,, A prospective nonrandomized clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety between half-fluence and full-fluence PDT. At 12 months, BCVA improvement was observed in both groups; however, there was no difference between them. Moreover, SRF reabsorption was found in 79% and 91% of the full-fluence and half-fluence groups, respectively. The other prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety between half-fluence and half-dose PDT for 6 months. The results revealed no significant differences in the parameters between the two groups. Therefore, half-dose and half-fluence PDT had similar therapeutic effects in improving visual acuity and SRF absorption in chronic CSC.
One retrospective study reported improvement in BCVA and central retinal thickness; however, the differences between groups were not statistically significant. Moreover, subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased in both groups; the full-fluence group showed a greater reduction of subfoveal choroidal thickness than the half-fluence group. Another retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of 192 CSC patients divided into untreated and half-dose PDT groups (treatemt group) with a minimum follow-up of all patients was 36 months. In the half-dose PDT group, BCVA was significantly better while recurrence of CSC was significantly lower, at the last follow-up. Furthermore, the other prospective, noncomparative case series studies assessing half-dose PDT showed visual improvements and complete SRF absorption.,
According to the long term clinical outcomes of a retrospective study evaluating full-fluence and half-fluence PDT for 36 months, either a full-fluence or half-fluence protocol was effective with significant long-term improvement in anatomic and functional outcomes with no recurrences, and very few cases of RPE atrophy were observed with both protocols. Furthermore, to decrease the risk of complications, a study was conducted on PDT spot size. Noh et al. reported that focal verteporfin PDT, confined to areas of localized leakage demonstrated in ICGA compared with conventional verteporfin PDT, covered the total area of abnormal choroidal vessels, including the leakage, resulting in a significant decrease in SRF and subfoveal choroidal thickness as well as conventional PDT during the 1-year follow-up. RPE atrophy was observed as a complication in one eye and three eyes in the focal and conventional verteporfin PDT groups, respectively. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups.
Recently, a study on the efficacy of treatment with high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (HSML) and PDT in patients with chronic CSC has been conducted. The PLACE trial is the largest multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the anatomic and functional efficacy and safety of half-dose PDT versus HSML treatment in patients with chronic CSC. At the final evaluation visit, a significantly higher percentage of PDT-treated patients demonstrated no SRF (67.2% vs. 28.8%; P < 0.001). Moreover, the PDT-treated patients showed a significantly higher increase in BCVA and a significantly higher increase in retinal sensitivity. Therefore, half-dose PDT is superior to HSML for treating chronic CSC, leading to a significantly higher proportion of patients with complete resolution of SRF and functional improvement.
There are few randomized studies evaluating PDT in CSC patients despite its many therapeutic advantages, and further investigation is needed to standardize PDT treatment in terms of dose, fluency, and time. The studies evaluating PDT treatment of patients with CSC are summarized in [Table 3].
|Table 3: Studies evaluating photodynamic therapy of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy|
Click here to view
| Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy|| |
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections have been suggested to effectively reduce choroidal hyperpermeability and proliferative activity of choroidal endothelial cells without clear evidence of increased VEGF levels in the aqueous humor of patients with CSC., Additionally, anti-VEGF is thought to control the tight junctions between endothelial cells and reduce vascular fenestrations.
Altering choroidal vascular permeability with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection has been suggested as a possible treatment for CSC since CSC is thought to be related to choroidal vasculature. However, anti-VEGF therapy for treating CSC is generally off-label. The effects of anti-VEGF treatment in patients with CSC have been reported in various ways.
Several studies have proven the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy associated with the resolution of neurosensory detachment and improvement of visual acuity., Moreover, the anti-VEGF agent may be a better treatment compared with PDT in CSC patients with fibrin observed in the fovea, indicating abnormal choroidal vessel leakage. In cases where verteporfin molecules bind to fibrin and PDT may cause RPE damage with energy accumulation, anti-VEGF therapy prevents complications.
However, the positive therapeutic effects of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for CSC have not been confirmed in a meta-analysis. Bae et al. performed a prospective, randomized study of chronic CSC comparing ranibizumab with half-fluence PDT., This study demonstrated the superiority of PDT over ranibizumab in terms of complete resolution of SRF and decreased choroidal hyperpermeability. Furthermore, chronic CSC patients treated with aflibercept appeared to have a significant resolution of SRF but no significant improvement in visual acuity in the contain study that suggested aflibercept showed clinical efficacy for better anatomical outcomes rather than functional outcomes.
Although many studies have been conducted on anti-VEGF therapy for patients with CSC, no large randomized controlled clinical trials have been performed. Therefore, further large randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to prove the positive effects of anti-VEGF therapy for CSC. The studies evaluating anti-VEGF treatment of patients with CSC are summarized in [Table 4].
|Table 4: Studies evaluating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy|
Click here to view
| Mineralocorticoid and Glucocorticoid-Receptor Antagonist|| |
Recently, many studies have investigated the use of MR and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists for the treatment of CSC worldwide. An increase in endogenous and exogenous corticosteroids was found to be related to CSC, and investigations about the mineralocorticoid pathway, which is a predominant pathway in CSC, have been performed., Interestingly, a cross-sectional study of 13 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism demonstrated that retinal abnormalities similar to subclinical CSC were found in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism. According to Zhao et al., CSC is correlated with abnormal activation and overexpression of ocular MR, and aldosterone or a high dose of GR increased the expression of water and ion channels on the outer limiting membrane in an animal model, related to the SRF, dilation of the choroid vessels, and leakage. Similar findings have been reported in human Muller glial cell lines. Based on these findings, the authors treated two patients with nonresolving chronic CSC with eplerenone for 5 weeks. These results support the MR signaling pathway as a control for choroidal vasculature, and blockage of MR as a treatment strategy for patients with CSC. Therefore, MR and GR antagonists are expected to alleviate SRF in CSC patients because of an increase in cortisol and dysregulation of endogenous MR.
MR antagonists' spironolactone and eplerenone have been employed in numerous retrospective and prospective studies to treat CSC. The binding affinity for MR was higher for spironolactone than for eplerenone. However, close monitoring of potassium level and renal function should be performed, and cardiac arrhythmia related to hyperkalemia should be considered before using MR antagonists. In addition, systemic side effects can also occur, such as hyperkalemia, hypotension, hypertriglyceridemia, hyponatremia, mastodynia, abnormal vaginal bleeding, and gynecomastia,
Eplerenone is a specific MR antagonist, used in heart failure management. Eplerenone is associated with a decreased incidence of spironolactone-related adverse events due to its molecular structure, increased selectivity, and fewer side effects related to the activation of progesterone receptors., Bousquet et al. treated 13 patients with CSC with 25 mg/day of oral eplerenone for a week followed by 50 mg/day for 1 or 3 months. They reported a significant decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) after 1 and 3 months, a significant decrease in SRF after 3 months, and a significant improvement in BCVA. Another prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study randomized 17 patients with chronic CSC to either eplerenone (50 mg/day) or placebo for 3 months. There was no significant difference in SRF and BCVA between the two groups. Additionally, a large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 114 patients with chronic CSC to either eplerenone or placebo. Its result suggested that eplerenone was not superior to placebo. Recently, a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled spectra trial reported that half-dose PDT is superior to oral eplerenone for chronic CSC patients concerning efficacy outcomes.
Spironolactone is a potassium-sparing diuretic that acts as a competitor for aldosterone. Various studies have confirmed the clinical effects of spironolactone in decreasing CMT, resolving SRF, and improving BCVA in CSC patients.,,,, Pichi et al. performed a prospective, placebo-controlled study to compare treatment with eplerenone and spironolactone in patients with chronic CSC, and concluded that spironolactone was comparable to eplerenone in resolving SRF and statistically superior to eplerenone in improving BCVA. In addition, both were superior to placebo in resolving SRF and improving BCVA. Furthermore, large prospective randomized trials are needed to better estimate the role and clinical efficacy of spironolactone in CSC.
Mifepristone is a high-affinity GR and progesterone receptor antagonist used in gynecological clinical practice. However, few studies have assessed mifepristone in patients with CSC. Thus, more evidence is needed to describe the clinical efficacy of mifepristone., The studies evaluating mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist of patients with CSC are summarized in [Table 5].
|Table 5: Studies evaluating mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy|
Click here to view
| Conclusion|| |
There are several treatment options for CSC; however, it is challenging in the real world because laser treatment and oral medication are not consistently effective, particularly in patients with chronic CSC. Because there is poor evidence for anti-VEGF therapy and oral medication, the appropriate treatment of choice for CSC remains controversial. In addition, the definition of the criteria for acute and chronic CSC should be considered, and the nomenclature needs specific modifications and a wider agreement to be implemented in clinical practice and clinical studies. Recently, large multicenter prospective randomized controlled trials were conducted, and, as a result, the treatment outcomes and strategies are gradually evolving. In the future, based on the analysis of more clinical studies, it is expected that the most appropriate treatment methods for patients with CSC will be determined.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initial will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Gass JD. Pathogenesis of disciform detachment of the neuroepithelium. Am J Ophthalmol 1967;63:l1-139.
Nicholson B, Noble J, Forooghian F, Meyerle C. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Update on pathophysiology and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol 2013;58:103-26.
Wang M, Munch IC, Hasler PW, Prünte C, Larsen M. Central serous chorioretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 2008;86:126-45.
Yamada K, Hayasaka S, Setogawa T. Fluorescein-angiographic patterns in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy at the initial visit. Ophthalmologica 1992;205:69-76.
Piccolino FC, Borgia L. Central serous chorioretinopathy and indocyanine green angiography. Retina 1994;14:231-42.
Spaide RF, Hall L, Haas A, Campeas L, Yannuzzi LA, Fisher YL, et al.
Indocyanine green videoangiography of older patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 1996;16:203-13.
Kitzmann AS, Pulido JS, Diehl NN, Hodge DO, Burke JP. The incidence of central serous chorioretinopathy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980-2002. Ophthalmology 2008;115:169-73.
Tsai DC, Chen SJ, Huang CC, Chou P, Chung CM, Huang PH, et al.
Epidemiology of idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy in Taiwan, 2001-2006: A population-based study. PLoS One 2013;8:e66858.
Haimovici R, Koh S, Gagnon DR, Lehrfeld T, Wellik S, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Case-Control Study Group. Risk factors for central serous chorioretinopathy: A case-control study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:244-9.
Battaglia Parodi M, Arrigo A, Iacono P, Falcomatà B, Bandello F. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Treatment with laser. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020;13:359.
Liew G, Quin G, Gillies M, Fraser-Bell S. Central serous chorioretinopathy: A review of epidemiology and pathophysiology. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;41:201-14.
Nicholson BP, Atchison E, Idris AA, Bakri SJ. Central serous chorioretinopathy and glucocorticoids: An update on evidence for association. Surv Ophthalmol 2018;63:1-8.
Bazzazi N, Ahmadpanah M, Akbarzadeh S, Seif Rabiei MA, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Brand S. In patients suffering from idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy, anxiety scores are higher than in healthy controls, but do not vary according to sex or repeated central serous chorioretinopathy. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2015;11:1131-6.
Yavaş GF, Küsbeci T, Kaşikci M, Günay E, Doğan M, Unlü M, et al.
Obstructive sleep apnea in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Curr Eye Res 2014;39:88-92.
Spiers JG, Chen HJ, Sernia C, Lavidis NA. Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis induces cellular oxidative stress. Front Neurosci 2014;8:456.
Vijayvergiya R, Vadivelu R. Role of Helicobacter pylori
infection in pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. World J Cardiol 2015;7:134-43.
Smal C, Lepièce G, Bonnet S. Central serous chorioretinopathy following the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. Rev Med Liege 2017;72:475-7.
Said-Ahmed K, Moustafa G, Fawzy M. Incidence and natural course of symptomatic central serous chorioretinopathy in pregnant women in a maternity hospital in Kuwait. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2012;19:273-6.
] [Full text]
Benfica CZ, Zanella T, Farias LB, Oppermann ML, Canani LH, Lavinsky D. Comparative analysis of choroidal thickness in third trimester pregnant women. Int J Retina Vitreous 2018;4:6.
Eom Y, Oh J, Kim SW, Huh K. Systemic factors associated with central serous chorioretinopathy in Koreans. Korean J Ophthalmol 2012;26:260-4.
Chatziralli I, Kabanarou SA, Parikakis E, Chatzirallis A, Xirou T, Mitropoulos P. Risk factors for central serous chorioretinopathy: Multivariate approach in a case-control study. Curr Eye Res 2017;42:1069-73.
Gilbert CM, Owens SL, Smith PD, Fine SL. Long-term follow-up of central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;68:815-20.
Loo RH, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr., Gass JD, Murray TG, Lewis ML, et al.
Factors associated with reduced visual acuity during long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2002;22:19-24.
van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EH, Yzer S, Ohno-Matsui K, Keunen JE, Schlingemann RO, et al.
Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline. Prog Retin Eye Res 2019;73:100770.
Daruich A, Matet A, Dirani A, Bousquet E, Zhao M, Farman N, et al.
Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent findings and new physiopathology hypothesis. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015;48:82-118.
Piccolino FC, De La Longrais RR, Manea M, Cicinelli S, Ravera G. Risk factors for posterior cystoid retinal degeneration in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2008;28:1146-50.
Levine R, Brucker AJ, Robinson F. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy by fluorescein angiography. Ophthalmology 1989;96:854-9.
Negi A, Marmor MF. Experimental serous retinal detachment and focal pigment epithelial damage. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:445-9.
Cardillo Piccolino F, Eandi CM, Ventre L, Rigault de la Longrais RC, Grignolo FM. Photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2003;23:752-63.
Taban M, Boyer DS, Thomas EL, Taban M. Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: Photodynamic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:1073-80.
Son BK, Kim K, Kim ES, Yu SY. Long-term outcomes of full-fluence and half-fluence photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmologica 2019;241:105-15.
Noh SR, Kang MS, Kim K, Kim ES, Yu SY. Comparison of focal and conventional verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol 2019;33:506-13.
Kishi S, Matsumoto H, Sonoda S, Hiroe T, Sakamoto T, Akiyama H. Geographic filling delay of the choriocapillaris in the region of dilated asymmetric vortex veins in central serous chorioretinopathy. PLoS One 2018;13:e0206646.
Hiroe T, Kishi S. Dilatation of asymmetric vortex vein in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmol Retina 2018;2:152-61.
Imanaga N, Terao N, Nakamine S, Tamashiro T, Wakugawa S, Sawaguchi K, et al.
Scleral thickness in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmol Retina 2021;5:285-91.
Yang HS, Kang TG, Park H, Heo JS, Park J, Lee KS, et al.
Quantitative evaluation of choriocapillaris using optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy after half-dose photodynamic therapy. PLoS One 2020;15:e0227718.
Sirakaya E, Duru Z, Kuçuk B, Duru N. Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios in patients with acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:854-8.
] [Full text]
Erol MK, Balkarli A, Yucel O, Akar Y, Dogan B, Suren E. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017;13:945-50.
Dursun A, Toker MI, Ozec AV, Bozali E, Kirboga K, Dursun FG, et al.
Relationship between mean platelet volume and central serous chorioretinopathy. Int Ophthalmol 2017;37:119-24.
Caccavale A, Romanazzi F, Imparato M, Negri A, Morano A, Ferentini F. Low-dose aspirin as treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4:899-903.
Zhao M, Célérier I, Bousquet E, Jeanny JC, Jonet L, Savoldelli M, et al.
Mineralocorticoid receptor is involved in rat and human ocular chorioretinopathy. J Clin Invest 2012;122:2672-9.
Arndt C, Sari A, Ferre M, Parrat E, Courtas D, De Seze J, et al.
Electrophysiological effects of corticosteroids on the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:472-5.
Schubert C, Pryds A, Zeng S, Xie Y, Freund KB, Spaide RF, et al.
Cadherin 5 is regulated by corticosteroids and associated with central serous chorioretinopathy. Hum Mutat 2014;35:859-67.
Lotery A, Sivaprasad S, O'Connell A, Harris RA, Culliford L, Ellis L, et al.
Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2020;395:294-303.
Kanda P, Gupta A, Gottlieb C, Karanjia R, Coupland SG, Bal MS. Pathophysiology of central serous chorioretinopathy: A literature review with quality assessment. Eye (Lond) 2022;36:941-62.
van Dijk EH, Schellevis RL, van Bergen MG, Breukink MB, Altay L, Scholz P, et al.
Association of a haplotype in the NR3C2 gene, encoding the mineralocorticoid receptor, with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:446-51.
Michael JC, Pak J, Pulido J, de Venecia G. Central serous chorioretinopathy associated with administration of sympathomimetic agents. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:182-5.
Tewari HK, Gadia R, Kumar D, Venkatesh P, Garg SP. Sympathetic-parasympathetic activity and reactivity in central serous chorioretinopathy: A case-control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3474-8.
Kaye R, Chandra S, Sheth J, Boon CJ, Sivaprasad S, Lotery A. Central serous chorioretinopathy: An update on risk factors, pathophysiology and imaging modalities. Prog Retin Eye Res 2020;79:100865.
Iacono P, Battaglia Parodi M, Falcomatà B, Bandello F. Central serous chorioretinopathy treatments: A mini review. Ophthalmic Res 2015;55:76-83.
Salehi M, Wenick AS, Law HA, Evans JR, Gehlbach P. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD011841.
Hofstetter W, Griffin J, Berman M, Everson R. Visual Science and Related Clinical Terms. Vol. 5. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000.
Mitsui Y, Matsubara M, Kanagawa M. Xenon light-exposure as a treatment of central serous retinopathy (a preliminary report). Nihon Ganka Kiyo 1969;20:291-4.
Manayath GJ, Ranjan R, Karandikar SS, Shah VS, Saravanan VR, Narendran V. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Current update on management. Oman J Ophthalmol 2018;11:200-6.
] [Full text]
Leaver P, Williams C. Argon laser photocoagulation in the treatment of central serous retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:674-7.
Burumcek E, Mudun A, Karacorlu S, Arslan MO. Laser photocoagulation for persistent central serous retinopathy: Results of long-term follow-up. Ophthalmology 1997;104:616-22.
Brancato R, Pratesi R, Leoni G, Trabucchi G, Vanni U. Histopathology of diode and argon laser lesions in rabbit retina. A comparative study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:1504-10.
Yannuzzi LA, Slakter JS, Kaufman SR, Gupta K. Laser treatment of diffuse retinal pigment epitheliopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 1992;2:103-14.
Landers MB 3rd
, Shaw HE Jr., Anderson WB Jr., Sinyai AJ. Argon laser treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. Ann Ophthalmol 1977;9:1567-72.
Robertson DM. Argon laser photocoagulation treatment in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1986;93:972-4.
Roisman L, Magalhães FP, Lavinsky D, Moraes N, Hirai FE, Cardillo JA, et al.
Micropulse diode laser treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A randomized pilot trial. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2013;44:465-70.
Verma L, Sinha R, Venkatesh P, Tewari HK. Comparative evaluation of diode laser versus argon laser photocoagulation in patients with central serous retinopathy: A pilot, randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN84128484]. BMC Ophthalmol 2004;4:15.
Ricci F, Missiroli F, Cerulli L. Indocyanine green dye-enhanced micropulsed diode laser: A novel approach to subthreshold RPE treatment in a case of central serous chorioretinopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 2004;14:74-82.
van Dijk EH, Fauser S, Breukink MB, Blanco-Garavito R, Groenewoud JM, Keunen JE, et al.
Half-dose photodynamic therapy versus high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: The PLACE Trial. Ophthalmology 2018;125:1547-55.
Roca JA, Wu L, Fromow-Guerra J, Rodríguez FJ, Berrocal MH, Rojas S, et al.
Yellow (577 nm) micropulse laser versus half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: Results of the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study (PACORES) Group. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:1696-700.
Koss MJ, Beger I, Koch FH. Subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation versus intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:307-14.
Arsan A, Kanar H, Sonmez A. Visual outcomes and anatomic changes after sub-threshold micropulse yellow laser (577-nm) treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: Long-term follow-up. Eye 2018;32:726-33.
Arora S, Sridharan P, Arora T, Chhabra M, Ghosh B. Subthreshold diode micropulse laser versus observation in acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Clin Exp Optom 2019;102:79-85.
Scholz P, Ersoy L, Boon CJ, Fauser S. Subthreshold micropulse laser (577 nm) treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmologica 2015;234:189-94.
Gawęcki M, Jaszczuk-Maciejewska A, Jurska-Jaśko A, Grzybowski A. Functional and morphological outcome in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy treated by subthreshold micropulse laser. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017;255:2299-306.
Schmidt-Erfurth U, Laqua H, Schlötzer-Schrehard U, Viestenz A, Naumann GO. Histopathological changes following photodynamic therapy in human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:835-44.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Viestenz A, Naumann GO, Laqua H, Michels S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Dose-related structural effects of photodynamic therapy on choroidal and retinal structures of human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:748-57.
Chan WM, Lai TY, Lai RY, Liu DT, Lam DS. Half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: One-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1756-65.
Parodi MB, Da Pozzo S, Ravalico G. Photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2003;23:235-7.
Pryds A, Larsen M. Choroidal thickness following extrafoveal photodynamic treatment with verteporfin in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:738-43.
Izumi T, Koizumi H, Maruko I, Takahashi Y, Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, et al.
Structural analyses of choroid after half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101:433-7.
Ruiz-Moreno JM, Lugo FL, Armadá F, Silva R, Montero JA, Arevalo JF, et al.
Photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:371-6.
Moon JW, Yu HG, Kim TW, Kim HC, Chung H. Prognostic factors related to photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:1315-23.
Lai TY, Chan WM, Li H, Lai RY, Liu DT, Lam DS. Safety enhanced photodynamic therapy with half dose verteporfin for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A short term pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:869-74.
Abouammoh MA. Advances in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2015;29:278-86.
Zhao MW, Zhou P, Xiao HX, Lv YS, Li CA, Liu GD, et al.
Photodynamic therapy for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: The safe effective lowest dose of verteporfin. Retina 2009;29:1155-61.
Lim JW, Kang SW, Kim YT, Chung SE, Lee SW. Comparative study of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy undergoing focal laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:514-7.
Zhao M, Zhang F, Chen Y, Dai H, Qu J, Dong C, et al.
A 50% vs. 30% dose of verteporfin (photodynamic therapy) for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:333-40.
Reibaldi M, Cardascia N, Longo A, Furino C, Avitabile T, Faro S, et al.
Standard-fluence versus low-fluence photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A nonrandomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:307-15.e2.
Cheng CK, Chang CK, Peng CH. Comparison of photodynamic therapy using half-dose of verteporfin or half-fluence of laser light for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2017;37:325-33.
Oh BL, Yu HG. Choroidal thickness after full-fluence and half-fluence photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2015;35:1555-60.
Lai TY, Wong RL, Chan WM. Long-term outcome of half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2015;113:T8.
Chan WM, Lai TY, Lai RY, Tang EW, Liu DT, Lam DS. Safety enhanced photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: One-year results of a prospective study. Retina 2008;28:85-93.
Karakus SH, Basarir B, Pinarci EY, Kirandi EU, Demirok A. Long-term results of half-dose photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy with contrast sensitivity changes. Eye (Lond) 2013;27:612-20.
Yannuzzi LA, Slakter JS, Gross NE, Spaide RF, Costa D, Huang SJ, et al.
Indocyanine green angiography-guided photodynamic therapy for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A pilot study. Retina 2003;23:288-98.
Iacono P, Tedeschi M, Boccassini B, Chiaravalloti A, Varano M, Parravano M. Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: Early and late morphological and functional changes after verteporfin photodynamic therapy. Retina 2019;39:980-7.
Lim JI, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Chakravarthy U, Flaxel CJ, Spaide RF, et al.
Collaborative retrospective macula society study of photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1073-8.
Fujita K, Imamura Y, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS, Mizutani Y, Hashizume K, et al.
One-year outcomes with half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2015;122:555-61.
Sheptulin V, Purtskhvanidze K, Roider J. Half-time photodynamic therapy in treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;256:2027-34.
Ozkaya A, Alkin Z, Ozveren M, Yazici AT, Taskapili M. The time of resolution and the rate of recurrence in acute central serous chorioretinopathy following spontaneous resolution and low-fluence photodynamic therapy: A case-control study. Eye (Lond) 2016;30:1005-10.
Alkin Z, Perente I, Ozkaya A, Alp D, Agca A, Aygit ED, et al.
Comparison of efficacy between low-fluence and half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:685-90.
Shin JY, Woo SJ, Yu HG, Park KH. Comparison of efficacy and safety between half-fluence and full-fluence photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2011;31:119-26.
Nicoló M, Eandi CM, Alovisi C, Grignolo FM, Traverso CE, Musetti D, et al.
Half-fluence versus half-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:1033-7.
Lai FH, Ng DS, Bakthavatsalam M, Chan VC, Young AL, Luk FO, et al.
A multicenter study on the long-term outcomes of half-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;170:91-9.
Liu HY, Yang CH, Yang CM, Ho TC, Lin CP, Hsieh YT. Half-dose versus half-time photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;167:57-64.
Kim YK, Ryoo NK, Woo SJ, Park KH. Comparison of visual and anatomical outcomes of half-fluence and half-dose photodynamic therapy in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;253:2063-73.
Tseng CC, Chen SN. Long-term efficacy of half-dose photodynamic therapy on chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:1070-7.
Shin MC, Lim JW. Concentration of cytokines in the aqueous humor of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2011;31:1937-43.
Lim JW, Ryu SJ, Shin MC. The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol 2010;24:155-8.
Peters S, Julien S, Heiduschka P, Grisanti S, Ziemssen F, Adler M, et al.
Antipermeability and antiproliferative effects of standard and frozen bevacizumab on choroidal endothelial cells. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:827-31.
Torres-Soriano ME, García-Aguirre G, Kon-Jara V, Ustariz-Gonzáles O, Abraham-Marín M, Ober MD, et al.
A pilot study of intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (case reports). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1235-9.
Artunay O, Yuzbasioglu E, Rasier R, Sengul A, Bahcecioglu H. Intravitreal bevacizumab in treatment of idiopathic persistent central serous chorioretinopathy: A prospective, controlled clinical study. Curr Eye Res 2010;35:91-8.
Kim M, Lee SC, Lee SJ. Intravitreal ranibizumab for acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmologica 2013;229:152-7.
Yannuzzi LA. Central serous chorioretinopathy: A personal perspective. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:361-3.
Bae SH, Heo JW, Kim C, Kim TW, Lee JY, Song SJ, et al.
A randomized pilot study of low-fluence photodynamic therapy versus intravitreal ranibizumab for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:784-92.e2.
Bae SH, Heo J, Kim C, Kim TW, Shin JY, Lee JY, et al.
Low-fluence photodynamic therapy versus ranibizumab for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: One-year results of a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2014;121:558-65.
Pitcher JD 3rd
, Witkin AJ, DeCroos FC, Ho AC. A prospective pilot study of intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: The CONTAIN study. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:848-52.
Tekin K, Sekeroglu MA, Cankaya AB, Teke MY, Doguizi S, Yilmazbas P. Intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the treatment of acute central serous chorioretihopathy: A single center retrospective study. Semin Ophthalmol 2018;33:265-70.
Lim JW, Kim MU. The efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:969-74.
Kim GA, Rim TH, Lee SC, Byeon SH, Koh HJ, Kim SS, et al.
Clinical characteristics of responders to intravitreal bevacizumab in central serous chorioretinopathy patients. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:732-40.
Peiretti E, Caminiti G, Serra R, Querques L, Pertile R, Querques G. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy versus photodynamic therapy in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2018;38:1526-32.
Roy R, Saurabh K, Das D, Panigrahi PK, Das S, Pal SS, et al.
Variation in visual outcome to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in choroidal neovascular membrane developing in eyes with previously untreated versus focal laser-treated central serous chorioretinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol 2017;32:781-6.
Ünlü C, Erdogan G, Aydogan T, Sezgin Akcay BI, Kardes E, Kiray GA, et al.
Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2016;11:61-5.
Kim DY, Joe SG, Yang SJ, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH. The association between choroidal thickness variations and response to intravitreal bevacizumab in central serous chorioretinopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol 2015;29:160-7.
van Dijk EH, Nijhoff MF, de Jong EK, Meijer OC, de Vries AP, Boon CJ. Central serous chorioretinopathy in primary hyperaldosteronism. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;254:2033-42.
Zhao M, Valamanesh F, Celerier I, Savoldelli M, Jonet L, Jeanny JC, et al.
The neuroretina is a novel mineralocorticoid target: Aldosterone up-regulates ion and water channels in Müller glial cells. FASEB J 2010;24:3405-15.
Haimovici R, Rumelt S, Melby J. Endocrine abnormalities in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2003;110:698-703.
Craft J. Eplerenone (Inspra), a new aldosterone antagonist for the treatment of systemic hypertension and heart failure. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2004;17:217-20.
Lainscak M, Pelliccia F, Rosano G, Vitale C, Schiariti M, Greco C, et al.
Safety profile of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Spironolactone and eplerenone. Int J Cardiol 2015;200:25-9.
Cakir B, Fischer F, Ehlken C, Bühler A, Stahl A, Schlunck G, et al.
Clinical experience with eplerenone to treat chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;254:2151-7.
Piccolino FC. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Some considerations on the pathogenesis. Ophthalmologica 1981;182:204-10.
Bousquet E, Beydoun T, Zhao M, Hassan L, Offret O, Behar-Cohen F. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A pilot study. Retina 2013;33:2096-102.
Schwartz R, Habot-Wilner Z, Martinez MR, Nutman A, Goldenberg D, Cohen S, et al.
Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy – A randomized controlled prospective study. Acta Ophthalmol 2017;95:e610-8.
van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EH, Tsonaka R, Feenstra HM, Dijkman G, Peters PJ, et al.
Half-dose photodynamic therapy versus eplerenone in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (SPECTRA): A randomized controlled trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2022;233:101-10.
Pichi F, Carrai P, Ciardella A, Behar-Cohen F, Nucci P, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Study Group. Comparison of two mineralcorticosteroids receptor antagonists for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. Int Ophthalmol 2017;37:1115-25.
Bousquet E, Beydoun T, Rothschild PR, Bergin C, Zhao M, Batista R, et al.
Spironolactone for nonresolving central serous chorioretinopathy: A randomized controlled crossover study. Retina 2015;35:2505-15.
Fusi-Rubiano W, Saedon H, Patel V, Yang YC. Oral medications for central serous chorioretinopathy: A literature review. Eye (Lond) 2020;34:809-24.
Herold TR, Rist K, Priglinger SG, Ulbig MW, Wolf A. Long-term results and recurrence rates after spironolactone treatment in non-resolving central serous chorio-retinopathy (CSCR). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017;255:221-9.
Sun X, Shuai Y, Fang W, Li J, Ge W, Yuan S, et al.
Spironolactone versus observation in the treatment of acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:1060-5.
Meijer OC, Koorneef LL, Kroon J. Glucocorticoid receptor modulators. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2018;79:107-11.
Nielsen JS, Jampol LM. Oral mifepristone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2011;31:1928-36.
Goldberg RA, Heier JS. Short-term oral mifepristone for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (STOMP CSC) – A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:782.
Kim DY, Lee JY, Lee EK, Kim JY. Comparison of visual/anatomical outcomes and recurrence rate between oral spironolactone and photodynamic therapy for nonresolving central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2020;40:1191-9.
Sacconi R, Baldin G, Carnevali A, Querques L, Rabiolo A, Marchini G, et al.
Response of central serous chorioretinopathy evaluated by multimodal retinal imaging. Eye (Lond) 2018;32:734-42.
Daruich A, Matet A, Dirani A, Gallice M, Nicholson L, Sivaprasad S, et al.
Oral mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists: Real-life experience in clinical subtypes of nonresolving central serous chorioretinopathy with chronic epitheliopathy. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2016;5:2.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]